Fundraising Hypocrisy - Arnold
Seeks Funds to Support His Initiative Agenda From Opponents
of Initiative Process and Redistricting Reform
From May 20-23, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
is traveling around the country for a series of fundraisers
for his California Recovery Team ballot committee. Schwarzenegger
is looking
to raise an additional $30 million on top of the $20 million
he says he has raised so far to pursue his ballot agenda
through the special election he has threatened to call this
year if negotiations with the Legislature don’t go as he wants.
Stops
are scheduled for Florida (Tampa, Orlando, and Miami), Chicago,
and Dallas.
While Schwarzenegger and his ally the California
Chamber of Commerce embrace the initiative process, Governor
Jeb Bush and the Florida Chamber of Commerce have been trying
to curtail Florida’s initiative process, saying that it is susceptible
to abuse by wealthy out-of-state interests who
“place their pet projects into Florida's Constitution through
well-financed ballot initiatives”. As Bush and/or members
of the Florida Chamber will very likely be attending Schwarzenegger’s
Florida fundraisers for his ballot agenda, it begs the following
questions:
Why is Governor Schwarzenegger raising funds for
his ballot agenda from people who oppose the ballot initiative
process?
Why are Governor Bush and members of the Florida
Chamber engaging in the very carpetbagger activity they complained
of in pushing their anti-initiative agenda?
California
Schwarzenegger’s ballot agenda is an extension
of his political philosophy, which can best be summed up by
a line from his 2005
State of the State Address: “Trust the people.” In another
speech, he has described the initiative process as one of
“the tools to take back their government” that the people have
available to them. He is actively campaigning for three initiatives
right now (redistricting reform, state spending cap, teacher
tenure changes) and is
considering campaigning for a fourth (requiring annual written
approval from members of public employee unions before the unions
can use dues for political campaigns – also known as “paycheck
protection”).
Bankrolling and backing Schwarzenegger’s efforts
is the California Chamber of Commerce, a staunch Schwarzenegger
ally from the outset of his political career -- Schwarzenegger
was the first candidate ever endorsed by the Chamber in California.
The Chamber continues to help him bankroll his ballot agenda
through the Chamber-backed Citizens
to Save California (CSC), which has raised
more than $10 million this year (Q1 and late filings) to
support Schwarzenegger’s agenda. On the front page of CSC’s
website is a photo of Schwarzenegger and the following quote:
"I get up every morning wanting to fix things here in Sacramento.
And today I ask you: Help me fix them."
Schwarzenegger’s involvement with CSC led TheRestofUs.org
to file a
complaint with the state Fair Political Practices Commission
that CSC was effectively controlled by Schwarzenegger and should
therefore have to abide by the contribution limits for candidate-controlled
ballot committees. CSC and Schwarzenegger joined
in filing a lawsuit against the regulation the FPPC complaint
accused them of violating. The CSC lawsuit is pending appeal,
putting on hold a lawsuit by TheRestofUs.org against Schwarzenegger
and CSC for campaign finance violations.
While the financial support for Schwarzenegger
and his ballot agenda has to date derived almost exclusively
from a small cadre of very wealthy donors – 60.5% of California
Recovery Team funds raised in 2005 have been raised in amounts
of $100,000 or greater; 66.1% of the Citizens to Save California
funds raised in 2005 have been raised in amounts of $100,000
or greater, 74.3% of the funds have been raised in amounts of
$50,000 or greater – his expressed preference is to trust the
people to make the call on tough decisions facing the state,
a philosophy
backed by the California Chamber of Commerce.
Such is not the case with their counterparts in
Florida.
Florida
Florida
Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida
Chamber of Commerce have thrown their weight behind several
bills
this year proposing to limit the ability of Florida citizens
to use the initiative process to amend the state constitution.
Only one, upping the requirement from 50% to 60% for any initiative
to pass, made it through the Legislature onto the 2006 ballot.
The bill HJR 1723, ironically only requires 50% of the vote
to pass.
Two other proposals would have limited the issues
that initiatives could deal with to a narrow range of “fundamental”
issues and required a two-thirds approval for any initiative
that levied or raised a tax or caused significant spending.
Last year, the Florida Chamber backed and won an initiative
requiring signatures for initiatives for the November elections
to be turned in by February.
Supporters of these proposals have argued that
the Florida initiative process has been corrupted by out-of-state
interests that finance wealthy campaigns. Mark Wilson, senior
vice president of the Florida Chamber of Commerce, described
the Legislature’s efforts to limit citizen ability to use the
initiative process: "For two years now, (the Legislature)
have realized how broken our constitutional amendment process
is and it's literally for sale."
On the Florida
Chamber’s website, it states that the limits on the initiative
process will “Eliminate the ability of special interests and
out of state organizations to place their pet projects into
Florida's Constitution through well-financed ballot initiatives.”
The Chamber has even started up its own website - VoteSmartFlorida.org
- on which it tells voters to “Beware
of Signing Petitions” and that contrary to popular belief,
“most signature gatherers are paid professionals who travel
from state to state, following the money from special interest
groups and disappearing as soon as the last dollar is spent
by the campaign.”
Governor Bush is scheduled to attend at least
two of the fundraisers. Many members of the Chamber of Commerce
will likely attend these parties to toast Governor Schwarzenegger
and to pour out-of-state cash into his ballot coffers, despite
their organization’s attempts in Florida to curtail the ballot
process. While the hypocrisy from both Schwarzenegger and his
Florida crew is evident, a look at the issue of redistricting
exposes further cracks in this cross-country fundraising coalition.
Legislative Redistricting
The difference between the approach of Governor
Schwarzenegger and the California Chamber of Commerce to redistricting
reform in California and that of Governor Bush and the Florida
Chamber of Commerce in Florida is stark, highlighting the inconsistencies
of Governor Schwarzenegger’s holding fundraisers in Florida
with Governor Bush and members of the Florida Chamber of Commerce.
In California, Schwarzenegger has rightly decried
the lack of competition resulting from the 2001 Legislature-drawn
redistricting plan as he has campaigned for a nonpartisan redistricting
commission. No seats in the California congressional delegation
or in the State Assembly switched parties in 2004. While Schwarzenegger
has negotiated with the Legislature on the issue, he has recognized
that the self-interested legislators that drew up the incumbent-protection
map in the first place may not be the best way to achieve his
goal, which has led to his support for the redistricting initiative.
In Florida, Governor Bush has not supported efforts
for a nonpartisan redistricting commission, nor has the Chamber,
although it
has highlighted the redistricting initiative as an example of
the problems with the Florida initiative process on its VoteSmartFlorida
website. Some have even suggested that some of the anti-initiative
efforts in the Florida Legislature are aimed
at a signature-gathering effort underway in Florida for an initiative
instituting a nonpartisan redistricting commission.
In other words, Governor Schwarzenegger is in
Florida to seek money in part to support his ballot efforts
to transfer the power of redistricting away from the California
state legislature to a nonpartisan redistricting commission.
He is seeking those funds from people who are fighting to hobble
the initiative process in Florida on the basis that out-of-state
interests have corrupted the process with money, motivated in
part by the desire to prevent the transfer of the power of redistricting
from the Florida state legislature to a nonpartisan redistricting
commission.
Recap:
| |
Governor Schwarzenegger |
California Chamber of Commerce |
Governor Bush |
Florida Chamber of Commerce |
Support Nonpartisan Redistricting? |
YES
|
YES
|
NO
|
NO
|
| Support Citizens Initiative Process? |
YES
|
YES
|
NO
|
NO
|
| Support Out-of-state $ for Initiatives? |
YES
|
YES
|
NO
|
NO
|
| Support Schwarzenegger Fundraising in Florida
for CA redistricting ballot initiative? |
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
Questions for Governor Schwarzenegger
-Do you support the people's initiative process?
-Do you support Governor Jeb Bush's attempts to curtail the
ballot initiative process in Florida?
-Do you support the efforts by the Florida Chamber of Commerce
to curtail the ballot initiative process in Florida?
-Do you support the notion of nonpartisan redistricting commissions?
-Do you see any problem/hypocrisy in taking money for your ballot
committee from opponents of the ballot initiative process?
-Do you see any problem in taking money for your efforts towards
a nonpartisan redistricting commission from opponents of those
efforts in Florida?
-If it's not right for you to interfere in Florida's politics
and policies, why is it right for Floridians to interfere with
California's?
Questions for Governor Bush
-Do you support Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's use of the
ballot initiative process in California?
-Do you support the efforts by the California Chamber of Commerce
to bankroll and further Governor Schwarzenegger's ballot agenda?
-Do you see any problem/hypocrisy in supporting the fundraising
efforts for Governor Schwarzenegger's ballot agenda while trying
to curtail the initiative process in your own state?
-Do you see any hypocrisy in decrying the influence of wealthy
out-of-state special interests in the Florida initiative process
while supporting Governor Schwarzenegger's efforts to raise
funds in Florida for his ballot agenda in California?
-Is it wrong for out-of-state interests to interfere with state
policies or ballot initiative campaigns?
-If it's wrong for out-of-staters to interfere with Florida's
initiative process, why is it acceptable for you and other Floridians
to interfere with California's?